- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 19:49:18 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Some thought about how `border-shape` works with `border-width` (hopefully we'll have time to discuss it at the F2F): It would be confusing in some scenarios if `border-width` affected both the box model and the stroke of a shape that might not be boxy at all. An author might change the `border-width` in order to change the stroke, to find out that it moves the child elements because the padding box had now moved... This is an issue with `border-shape` being purely decorative on one hand, but respecting layout properties for its style on the other hand. I wonder if `border-shape` should have a `stroke` in addition to the shape(s), which could have the `border-width` as a default. Same for `fill` and `border-color`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6997#issuecomment-2619921409 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2025 19:49:19 UTC