Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] Overload `path()` for CSS-y SVG path syntax instead of taking up `shape()` (#10647) from Simon Fraser via GitHub on 2025-01-28 (public-css-archive@w3.org from January 2025)

From: Simon Fraser via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 16:37:36 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-2619514558-1738082254-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

I think the shape syntax fulfills many of the issues raised in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9889, but maybe not all of them. I'd like to see a list of potential features of a separate `shape` function that are currently not supported, so we can judge whether it's worth saving `shape()` for a different thing in future.


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by smfr
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10647#issuecomment-2619514558 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2025 16:37:37 UTC