- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 07:13:21 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I think it would be fine if that direction ended up becoming a `path()` overload. So the issue was not so much with the details of 'shape()', but with giving it a new name rather than exposing it as a 'path' overload? I don't have a strong opinion about this, happy to hear from others or resolve at the WG one way or another. -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10647#issuecomment-2618089541 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2025 07:13:22 UTC