Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position] `anchor()` Fallback type inconsistency vs WPT (#10831)

The CSS Working Group just discussed ``[css-anchor-position] `anchor()` Fallback type inconsistency vs WPT``, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Close no change`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;emilio> TabAtkins: in this issue it was raised that there's an inconsistency with the spec that says `&lt;length-percentage>` on the fallback<br>
&lt;emilio> ... anchor and anchor-size are both `&lt;length>`s<br>
&lt;emilio> ... so type wise they should be valid fallback<br>
&lt;emilio> ... so afaict there's no inconsistency<br>
&lt;emilio> RESOLVED: Close no change<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10831#issuecomment-2607914434 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2025 18:02:06 UTC