- From: Roman Komarov via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 22:56:24 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Now that https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9141 is closed, and we will have `ident()`, should we return to this issue as well, while we're at it? I'd vote for `string()` for the function name, as it will have a nice consistency and discoverability based on the already existent `<string>` type and the `<ident>` + `ident()` pair. cc @bramus @tabatkins -- GitHub Notification of comment by kizu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/542#issuecomment-2591274835 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2025 22:56:25 UTC