- From: Josh Tumath via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 18:36:14 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I commented on Apple's proposal: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11480#issuecomment-2590784323 I like it, but I'm wondering if it leads us towards a hybrid of Apple and Google's syntax proposals. Each layout system still has properties unique to it, like `flex` or `grid-template-columns`. Where it's not possible to unify layout properties as per the TAG review recommendation, maybe it does make sense, after all, to have `masonry-*` properties? So I'm interested in what other opportunities we have to unify the syntax, which may help to address Tab's concerns. (https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11243#issuecomment-2563983858). -- GitHub Notification of comment by JoshTumath Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11243#issuecomment-2590833795 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2025 18:36:15 UTC