- From: Koji Ishii via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 08:13:01 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The resolution was made not because it was better, but because we didn't have data which is more intuitive. By requiring two values: * We can collect data which is more desirable. * We can change the default value safely, without breaking existing pages. > Let's revert the resolution in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10703 and instead default like this: I think everyone agrees that reverting is better, but there's no consensus on "instead default like this" yet. Though, I agree that requiring `text` in the `text-box: trim-start cap text` syntax is a bit troublesome, even for a while until we get a consensus on the desired default value. How about allowing `auto` as over or under value? Then you can write, similar to the [`overflow` property](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-overflow/#propdef-overflow): ``` text-box: cap auto; text-box: auto alphabetic; ``` ? -- GitHub Notification of comment by kojiishi Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11460#issuecomment-2589272315 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2025 08:13:03 UTC