- From: Kevin Babbitt via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 18:30:50 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
kbabbitt has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-gaps-1] Naming bi-directional gap decoration shorthand == Gaps 1 defines [the `gap-rule` property](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-gaps-1/#gap-rule-bi-directional) as a shorthand which sets widths, styles, and colors in both the row and column directions. In the [TAG review thread](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1035) for CSS Gap Decorations, @LeaVerou asked: > Why gap-rule and not just rule which would be consistent with the row-gap/column-gap/gap shorthand? To which I responded: > I was a little concerned about overloading a general term like "rule" in case we at some point discover some other place we want to paint rules, and to avoid confusion between a CSS rule and the CSS rule property. I wanted to open a discussion to get more opinions from the WG about this. What do folks think? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11495 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 13 January 2025 18:30:51 UTC