Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images-4] [css-values-5] [css-mixins] The `type()` function is underspecified (#11468)

See #10810 for a related discussion. But I do not know if having both a context-sensitive `type()` and a context-insensitive `<type()>` is a problem. I agree that CSS V&U would be a good place for `<type()>` defining a syntax.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by cdoublev
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11468#issuecomment-2580647778 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 9 January 2025 16:01:13 UTC