- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 15:13:42 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
So we have: > * RESOLVED: Add a set of keywords from SCript and Script Extensions and a https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/labels/Needs%20Edits label. But subsequent discussion makes me believe this isn't as ready-to-go as we [believed in September 2024](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4573#issuecomment-2372608901): > It sounds like we might need a little bit of an algorithm spec on top of the [RGI_Emoji_Qualification](https://unicode.org/reports/tr51/#def_rgi_emoji_qualification) property. > I don't think we can put anything that is context-dependent on unicode-range. Unicode range can really just be a simple codepoint filter. > We need a new proposal for a definitive solution, and [proposal L2/22-160](https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2022/22160-rgi-emoji-qual.pdf)(RGI_Emoji_Qualification, by @macchiati ) looks promising. I think this needs to be fleshed out a bit more, in terms of the exact functionality and also how it integrates with the existing `unicode-range` syntax, before spec edits are attempted. -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4573#issuecomment-2580530864 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 9 January 2025 15:13:43 UTC