Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-mixins] `<dashed-function>` syntax seems invalid (#10558)

> You started discussing this in the https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10558#issuecomment-2226420917 above:

Yeah, note that my comment was that it was weird to allow `foo ()` and we probably shouldn't do it. ^_^

> if I see `fn (a)` in a value definition, is that allowed? does it represent a function or a keyword and a simple block?

That is an ident followed by a paranthesized block, no ambiguity. 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10558#issuecomment-2686308700 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2025 22:03:54 UTC