- From: Miriam Suzanne via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 20:34:50 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Yeah, I see how that example is potentially confusing, because it removes the explicit `&` from the 'result' - which is not the same as if that was written directly, and had the implicit `&` applied. I'm not sure there's an obvious fix besides rewording the example. Marking this as editorial, if someone wants to suggest an edit - or if one of the nesting spec authors wants to pick it up. -- GitHub Notification of comment by mirisuzanne Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9370#issuecomment-2669701051 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2025 20:34:51 UTC