- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:04:33 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
For the weekly meeting, the discussion is about whether to keep the `shape()` name for `shape`, or change it to be an overload of `path`. I am in favor of keeping the separate `shape()` word, to maintain the expectation that `path` is directly related to SVG. See #11628. A `shape()` is a set of rules that end up creating a `path()`. Responding to https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10647#issuecomment-2619514558, there could be future enhancement to `shape()` in the future, but nothing is stopping us from overloading `shape()` at that point if needed. -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10647#issuecomment-2650194194 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2025 09:04:34 UTC