- From: robglidden via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 22:01:14 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@bramus Yes, in the longer thread [above](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11509#issuecomment-2638002258) I think I am responding to what I think is @KurtCattiSchmidt's interpretation of how to potentially address that same F2F discussion/decision: > The CSSWG decided at the F2F last week to not go with URL fragments for binding to @sheet identifiers, so we're now looking into adding an attribute to <link> tags to specify which sheet is being imported as well as adding an optional identifier to @import for similar functionality there (e.g. @import sheet1 from "style.css"). Are you and @KurtCattiSchmidt talking about the same thing? I am assuming @KurtCattiSchmidt [meant](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11509#issuecomment-2641418282) that `<link rel="stylesheet" href="#reference-straight-to-an-atsheet-inside-a-style-element" />` was out? So the explainer was [updated](https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/commit/17359ed30b2b707545bdfb90625368014508033c) to consider `<link rel="stylesheet" href="#sheet" sheet="foo" />`? With a [potential new proposal](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11509#issuecomment-2641472010) to flesh out the natural consequences of thereby enabling `<link rel="stylesheet" href="#sheet" />`? Please correct my misunderstanding. -- GitHub Notification of comment by robglidden Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11509#issuecomment-2649341145 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 10 February 2025 22:01:15 UTC