- From: Yehonatan Daniv via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 16:07:51 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@tidoust thanks! LGTM. > so if css-animations-2 defines the values, web-animations-2 should reference them and not attempt to re-define them. In css-animations-2 we have a more user-facing definition which describes the behavior of each type for authors. In web-animations-2 we have a more implementor-facing definition which describes the behavior of each type for implementors. See [@flackr's comment here](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/10128#discussion_r1598791377). -- GitHub Notification of comment by ydaniv Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/11664#issuecomment-2643348535 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 7 February 2025 16:07:53 UTC