- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 21:55:07 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
fantasai has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-fonts-4] all-small-caps vs unicameral scripts == WebKit recently got a bug filed against our `all-small-caps` implementation [complaining](https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158522) that we are synthesizing small-caps for unicameral scripts (Japanese, specifically). The reporter pointed to Firefox as having the right behavior. Opening this issue to ask a few questions, particularly to @jfkthame: - Not synthesizing for `small-caps` is unquestionably the right behavior, but for `all-small-caps`, where the idea is to get all the letters and symbols to match, is this the right behavior? It would create distinct sizes for glyphs belonging to bicameral vs unicameral scripts. - If yes, then we shouldn't synthesize for any unicameral scripts. What do we do for symbols and punctuation, then? Should they match the sizing of unicameral scripts (full size), or those of bicameral scripts (shrunk down)? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11640 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 3 February 2025 21:55:08 UTC