- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 14:18:47 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
To be precise, I said "agree on a ***good*** name". To be honest, I don't like any of the suggestions I have seen so far, other than [Tim's](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9083#issuecomment-3525850358), but that one doesn't seem web compatible. The attempt for a poll above didn't get much traction, so it seems people aren't very enthusiastic either about the proposed names. A suboptimal name can be acceptable for an important functionality that can't be achieved in other ways, but here the usecase is covered by `revert-rule`, so I think the bar for a good name should be higher. Then my preference is to not add the shorthand at this point. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9083#issuecomment-3670517585 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2025 14:18:47 UTC