- From: Alison Maher via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 15:59:45 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I’m not following how grid-lanes is 1D. We only use one dimension of lanes, but items are placed in two dimensions. @astearns When I mentioned 1D vs 2D, it was about the structure of the layout, not what it may look like. For example, in Grid Lanes, you can only explicitly place items in one dimension, whereas in Grid, you can place an item explicitly in both dimensions. Grid Lanes only has one structured dimension, and is more similar to Flex in this regard, and thus would better match that mental model when defining directionality. > Could there be something in a B1a where grid-auto-flow does not determine the grid-lanes direction? If you set grid-template-columns you get waterfall, if you set grid-template-rows you get masonry, and if you set both you get waterfall (picking that as the default). This is what the default of `normal` does, but if we use `grid-auto-flow`, `column` and `row` do have to mean something, and with B1, they will match the opposite direction of the template track definition you want, and with B2 the keywords mean something different than in Grid. -- GitHub Notification of comment by alisonmaher Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12803#issuecomment-3666012766 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2025 15:59:46 UTC