- From: Lea Verou via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2025 20:51:33 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@Loirooriol That was exactly what I was thinking at first, but guaranteed invalid is actually *more* useful for authors, because **they can provide fallbacks that are different per use**. This is a big limitation of the existing `@property` syntax. So, by doing it that way, not only we help ergonomics, we actually plug a gap too. So I'm currently quite strongly in favor of this direction. -- GitHub Notification of comment by LeaVerou Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13211#issuecomment-3648106622 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 12 December 2025 20:51:34 UTC