- From: vmpstr via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2025 16:35:36 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I'd prefer it to not be developer stylable by the -ua-root name Naively it would still be stylable if there's a `view-transition-class` on that element, or are you suggesting that this also shouldn't be the case? We don't apply `overflow: clip` by default (unless we resolve to do so), so some styling would still be necessary here. We could adopt something like if the underlying element has overflow non-visible, then clip otherwise visible. But that seems like a separate issue, which may be necessary if we don't allow developer styling. Because of this, I do support allowing the same stylability as anything else in vt -- GitHub Notification of comment by vmpstr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12324#issuecomment-3647300466 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 12 December 2025 16:35:37 UTC