Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] [scoped] Clarify the ::v-t box and stacking context position relative to the scope (#12324)

> > we would create `::view-transition-group-children(root)` even if the developer sets `view-transition-name: none`
> 
> This breaks the basic promise of “Elements with a `view-transition-name` (other than `none`) get captured”, which I think would be confusing.

It depends on what we mean by "captured". In the pixel sense, it's still true. In the geometry sense, scopes would have to be special here in that they still create the necessary structure to retain the geometry information

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by vmpstr
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12324#issuecomment-3637735009 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 10 December 2025 15:47:26 UTC