- From: vmpstr via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:44:49 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
A comment on whether group-children is a direct child of the ::v-t: I'm happy to say that we also create an empty ::view-transition-group(!?) to nest this, just not the image-pair and its children. It sounds like the idea is roughly the same, modulo coming up with what goes in the pseudo argument. One idea is that since we can say that scope elements are special in that they are the only ones that can have a view-transition-group: contain without a name, and come up with new keyword to say that.. One option is `root`, but that's not a good one since it's already explicitly a non-reserved thing that we put on the documentElement by default. Maybe something like `scope-root` -- GitHub Notification of comment by vmpstr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12324#issuecomment-3637721868 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 10 December 2025 15:44:50 UTC