- From: Emilio Cobos Álvarez via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2025 16:53:14 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> To be clear I'm not against saying that widgets shouldn't have a ::before or ::after. It's just that I don't think that the restriction on replaced elements is also covering widgets. Ah, thanks. Sorry, just read this after posting the wall of text above. Ok, so can we agree on: * Defining this new "widget" concept which isn't quite using the same replaced sizing concept as images. * Define that generated content pseudo-elements work only on some widgets (following the rationale defined above)? I believe that makes all engines converge (Firefox needs to implement the generated content in a few places, and WebKit / Blink removing it from others), but I think the result is probably more sensible than the current state of things, which feels mostly random. -- GitHub Notification of comment by emilio Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12876#issuecomment-3613219011 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 4 December 2025 16:53:15 UTC