- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2025 17:17:52 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `Republishing Tasks Permathread`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Republish WD of Tables 3` * `RESOLVED: Republish Borders 4 WD` * `RESOLVED: Repub WD of Shadow Parts 1` * `RESOLVED: Repub UI 4 as WD` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <TabAtkins> Rossen: 6 more drafts that need republishing<br> <TabAtkins> Rossen: first CSS Tables 3<br> <TabAtkins> SebastianZ: last time we discussed Table it didn't have an editor, now it has one assigned (Keith)<br> <TabAtkins> SebastianZ: so maybe we can resolve on publishing now<br> <ChrisL> +1 now we have an editor<br> <TabAtkins> +1<br> <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: Republish WD of Tables 3<br> <TabAtkins> SebastianZ: next is Borders 4, this is my spec<br> <TabAtkins> SebastianZ: there were a bunch of new features added and changes made, so it's time to repub<br> <TabAtkins> +1<br> <ChrisL> +1<br> <TabAtkins> SebastianZ: last pub was earlier this year (FPWD), want another WD<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: if your edits all have WG resolutions you can publish without asking, fyi<br> <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: Republish Borders 4 WD<br> <TabAtkins> SebastianZ: Shadow Parts was last published in 2018. i've updated Changes section and added wpt coverage<br> <TabAtkins> +1<br> <TabAtkins> Rossen: any objections?<br> <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: Repub WD of Shadow Parts 1<br> <TabAtkins> Rossen: then UI 3 and 4<br> <TabAtkins> SebastianZ: Maybe shoudl go with UI 4 first, i think it's easier<br> <TabAtkins> SebastianZ: lots of changes and major features since last pub, many already implemented<br> <ntim> q-<br> <TabAtkins> SebastianZ: so i thin kit's fine to repub<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: i think as long as Florian is ready to publish and does the publishing, i'm okay with it. i'll defer to him.<br> <TabAtkins> Rossen: let's resolve to publish and action Florian for it<br> <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: Repub UI 4 as WD<br> <TabAtkins> Rossen: now 3<br> <TabAtkins> ChrisL: Wasn't clear to me why it needs repub, it's just editorial changes and it's a lot of work to update an old spec like that<br> <ChrisL> s/old spec/old Rec/<br> <TabAtkins> SebastianZ: tha'ts fine for me. i updated the changes list from the Rec, there's a few clarifications but they're not huge changes<br> <SebastianZ> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui-3/#changes-2018-06-21<br> <TabAtkins> Rossen: I agree with Chris that it's not a lot of benefit, but is a lot of work...<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: if it's just editorial we can just republish<br> <TabAtkins> Rossen: is it?<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: there's some minor non-editorial<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: think we can defer to Florian<br> <TabAtkins> SebastianZ: last is Rachel publishing Animation Worklet<br> <TabAtkins> SebastianZ: been on the list for a year or so, dont' know the status<br> <TabAtkins> flackr: there's an experimental impl in Chromium but nobody else has looked at it, and we're not planning on shipping yet<br> <TabAtkins> SebastianZ: Rob's an editor<br> <TabAtkins> flackr: i don't think there's been any recent work on it. for now i'd consider it a non-active spec<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6900#issuecomment-3607932724 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2025 17:17:53 UTC