- From: andruud via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 14:06:23 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
andruud has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-mixins-1] When does (custom) `env()` resolve? == When a (custom) `env()` is used in a _declaration_ inside a mixin, when do we expect that to resolve? Example: ``` @mixin --m(--color) { & { color: env(--color); } } ``` Currently, `env()` resolves computed-value-time, together with `var()` and other arbitrary substitution functions. To maintain that, we'd need to "remember" which mixin rule encloses us until computed-value-time. (Which may become even harder depending on what we decide for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12675.) Or, we could specify that these `env()` functions resolve at `@apply`-time, but that would mean that the later stages of the pipeline is unaware that an `env()` ever existed there---I'm not sure if this has any unintended consequences or not. At minimum, we need to define what happens when an `@apply`-time `env()` becomes IACVT (IAAT = invalid at apply time?), because we cannot treat a declaration as `unset` at that point: ``` @mixin --m() { & { color: env(--invalid); /* What now? */ } } ``` Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12676 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2025 14:06:24 UTC