- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:33:39 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I am not completely convinced yet to use the `fill-*` and `stroke-*` properties here. Or, at least, the `border-*-{width|color|style}` properties should still apply when `border-shape` is not `box` but might be overwritten by `fill-*` and `stroke-*`. > > Reasons for my reluctance: > > * `border-*` presumably already covers many/most use cases (and [@noamr](https://github.com/noamr)'s demos look fairly reasonable). Not border-width. There is no reasonable way to render variable border-width. > * `fill-*` and `stroke-*` as defined in [Fill and Stroke](https://drafts.fxtf.org/fill-stroke/#fill-repeat) are much more complex than `border-*`, at least all of them are meant to be supported. Is this a problem? > * While the issue started out regarding single-path shapes, it derived to also cover double-path shapes, and `stroke-*` properties are designed for single paths for the outline and `fill-*` properties are meant to fill the inner part of the geometry, not the border. This question led to thinking about rendering of border-shape in general. -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11662#issuecomment-3204831994 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2025 08:33:40 UTC