- From: Frog Chen via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 00:43:44 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Oh, I see. I've skipped the algorithms before. It makes sense now. I suppose it is better to at least mention such a discrepancy between a mathematical superellipse and a CSS `superellipse()` in prose, then? In the current form of the spec, a reader can not see the fact unless they work through the details of the algorithms. -- GitHub Notification of comment by satgo1546 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12620#issuecomment-3203559885 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2025 00:43:45 UTC