- From: Guillaume via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 19:26:33 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
cdoublev has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-values-5] `var()` fallback containing a positioned `{}` == `opacity: var(--custom, {} 1)` is valid in Chrome and FF today but is invalid per [spec](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-5/#component-function-commas): > the `<declaration-value>` defined for the fallback value of `var()` [...] follows the standard comma-containing production rules when it does start with a "{" token The aforementioned related rule is: > If it does start with a "{" token, then the production matches just the {} block that the "{" token opens. This was introduced following the resolution in #9539. A positioned `{}` is valid only in a custom property value therefore any declaration value would be invalid at computed value time after substituting the fallback of `var(--custom, {} 1)` or `var(--custom, 1 {})`. However, `var(--custom, 1 {})` is valid, per spec: > the `<declaration-value>` defined for the fallback value of `var()` [...] ignores the rules restricting what it can contain when it does not start with a "{" token: it is allowed to contain commas and {} blocks. So I suspect this breaking change is not intentional. This was a follow-up of this [comment](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9539#issuecomment-2689050085). Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12625 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2025 19:26:34 UTC