- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 13:48:28 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just [discussed](https://www.w3.org/2025/08/19-css-color-minutes.html#c3a6) `[css-color-5] Make channel values in relative color syntax optional](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10689)` and agreed to the following: * `[css-color-5] Make channel values in relative color syntax optional](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10689)` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> ChrisL: the idea is lot of use case are deal by a new relative color syntax when you dont specifify the color space because you just want to change the alpha <br> <TabAtkins> `alpha(<color> / <alpha>)` <br> ChrisL: Im proposing a new relative syntax for just changing the alpha : alpha(<color> / <alpha>) <br> ChrisL: 2 syntaxes proposed : alpha or opacity <br> ChrisL: people prefers alpha <br> TabAtkins: I think its a good move <br> <ChrisL> proposal: add an alpha-only RCS function `alpha()` <br> lea: I though the thread was about making components optional in RCS <br> ChrisL: the good part of this new syntax is that you dont have to specifiy the color space which prevent mistakes <br> `RESOLUTION: add an alpha-only RCS function `alpha()`` <br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10689#issuecomment-3200847706 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2025 13:48:29 UTC