- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 12:03:32 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed ``[css-view-transitions-1] What's the point of position: fixed in `::view-transition`?``, and agreed to the following: * ``RESOLVED: `::view-transition` pseudo-element uses `position: absolute` instead `position: fixed` in the UA stylesheet`` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <ntim> emilio: basically the UA stylesheet has a rule where the VT pseudo is position: fixed<br> <ntim> emilio: a bit odd because the snapshot containing block per-spec is a fixedpos CB as well<br> <ntim> emilio: so that means abspos and fixpos are identical<br> <ntim> ...Is there anything I'm missing or should it be abspos?<br> <ntim> flackr: how does it work with scroll?<br> <ntim> emilio: it's the same because snapshot CB is fixed as well<br> <ntim> noamr: I don't have context<br> <ntim> noamr/flackr: probably no reason<br> <ntim> emilio: should we resolve to make it abspos?<br> <ntim> noamr: lets do it<br> <ntim> RESOLVED: `::view-transition` pseudo-element uses `position: absolute` instead `position: fixed` in the UA stylesheet<br> <ntim> flackr: might have to be `!important` for scoped VT<br> <flackr> s/`!important`/important<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12116#issuecomment-3200476838 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2025 12:03:33 UTC