- From: Alison Maher via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2025 19:28:08 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
alisonmaher has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-grid-3][Masonry] Auto repeat and other intrinsic track sizes == In [css-grid-3](https://www.w3.org/TR/css-grid-3/#masonry-intrinsic-repeat) is a tentative definition for sizing auto tracks within an auto repeat. This means that `repeat(auto-fill, auto)` would be valid, but would `auto repeat(auto-fill, auto) auto` also be valid? If this should be valid, what about `auto min-content repeat(auto-fill, auto) auto max-content` or `auto repeat(auto-fill, 100px) auto`? Currently, per css-grid-2, we force all tracks outside of an auto-repeat to be fixed. This potentially doesn't need to be the case, but I'm inclined to believe we should maintain this rule, even if we resolve to allow intrinsic repeaters, since that would incur quite a bit more complexity to the algorithm, and I'm not sure there is a good use case for this. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12580 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2025 19:28:09 UTC