- From: Christoph Päper via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2025 15:05:56 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
That’s just explicitly mentioning that [temporal media fragments](https://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/#naming-time) should be supported, isn’t it? [Support for that](https://caniuse.com/media-fragments) could be improved indeed, but apparently it is still better than for spatial media fragments. I don’t know if browser vendors would be more likely to implement [URL modifiers](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#url-modifiers) that did the same thing essentially but were limited to CSS. If this was format-specific, it could become part of [`param()`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-link-params/#setting-url), but I believe it is generic enough. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Crissov Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12558#issuecomment-3144891140 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 1 August 2025 15:05:57 UTC