- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 16:09:42 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `FPWD for CSS Custom Functions`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Publish FPWD of CSS Custom Functions` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <JoshT> Topic: FPWD for CSS Custom Functions<br> <JoshT> Rossen: We need FPWD so people can ship<br> <fantasai> github:<br> <fantasai> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6900<br> <TabAtkins> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-mixins-1/<br> <JoshT> TabAtkins: We've been talking about mixins spec for a while. Discussed in F2F.<br> <JoshT> ... believe spec is ready for FPWD<br> <fantasai> We are *overdue* for FPWD...<br> <JoshT> ... close to ready for CR<br> <JoshT> ... at least FPWD. let's resolve to do it.<br> <JoshT> Rossen: Any issues with that?<br> <astearns> +1 to FPWD<br> <lea> +1 to FPWD (and to fantasai's comment)<br> <florian> sure, go ahead. If it's nearly ready for CR, it really ought to get on TR at all<br> <JoshT> RESOLVED: Publish FPWD of CSS Custom Functions<br> <JoshT> TabAtkins: I'll get publication started.<br> <Rossen5> q?<br> <Rossen5> ack fantasai<br> <JoshT> fantasai: I wanted to find out plan for review of draft.<br> <JoshT> TabAtkins: As in when we ping other groups?<br> <JoshT> fantasai: and blog and trying to get people to look at it<br> <fantasai> s/and blog/yes and blog/<br> <JoshT> TabAtkins: We've had shakeup of staff so may be difficult, but I will take care of those.<br> <JoshT> ... I don't think this needs wider review from a11y or i18n?<br> <JoshT> fantasai: I still think we need to ping them all because requirement for CR<br> <astearns> ping everyone and let them say “no comment”<br> <JoshT> ... so publish blog post, ping groups<br> <JoshT> jensimmons: it's worth taking the time to get dev and browser team feedback<br> <PaulG> (from APA) it's low-level so probably not an issue but will depend on whether patterns of use emerge during socialization that alarm APA<br> <JoshT> ... I know it takes time, but we are at our best as WG when things have baked well before shipping<br> <JoshT> TabAtkins: Early feedback has been positive. YouTube personalities seem to like it.<br> <JoshT> ... but as spec author, I would say that ;)<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6900#issuecomment-2842509969 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2025 16:09:43 UTC