- From: Jake Archibald via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 07:50:50 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
btw, I'm serious. I think this part of the TAG review is right: > but because this behavior is achievable using `attr(id type(<custom-ident>), match-element)`, we'd encourage the WG and browsers to spend some more time looking for a safer default behavior before giving this behavior a keyword. The best bit about `attr(id type(<custom-ident>), match-element)` is it gives developers more of a chance of seeing the issues with this in a code review, and switching to a different attribute that's safer to use. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jakearchibald Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12091#issuecomment-2820471090 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2025 07:50:50 UTC