- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 20:48:38 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
If it's not useful to mix and match with CSS properties etc, it's a bit weird that they're using the `<url>` type. I'd probably tend to let them have their own definition of `string | url() | src()` or some such that is not a `<url>` (if we want to keep the `url()` backwards compat); That definition can live in the `@namespace` definition or alongside the `url` definition, it doesn't really matter. -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12077#issuecomment-2802950474 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 14 April 2025 20:48:42 UTC