Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-2][css-animations-2]Should an animation-trigger prevent its animation from taking effect until the trigger says so? (#11971)

Sorry, just catching up on this thread because I was pinged on #12064 (otherwise I've been trying to keep out of the scroll-driven animations and animation triggers discussions so I don't hold things up).

The original proposal made sense to me so I'm trying to get on board with the reasoning for the updated proposal (which I think it starting to make sense).

Just to check, if I create an `Animation` with a backwards fill mode, the moment I attach a trigger to it, it takes effect?

If so, I think it will be treated as being "in effect".

And why do we need to tweak the definition of "current animation effect" if an idle trigger already ensures that we're in the before phase?

Do you mind if we continue this discussion async? I won't be able to join the telcon (timezone).

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by birtles
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11971#issuecomment-2791411377 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 10 April 2025 02:46:09 UTC