- From: Brandon McConnell via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 15:11:48 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@nt1m Sounds good, thanks. I do see the value in having the shorthand `number` type equivalent to `type(<number>)`, but that might be a discussion better had re `attr()`. Then, hopefully, those benefits will carry over here if we match the syntax for `control-value()`. This is probably a one-off exception case, where a unit-less `number` is as common as those other unit types, is a native type for inputs (`type="number"`), and is commonly used in attributes as well. -- GitHub Notification of comment by brandonmcconnell Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7869#issuecomment-2772908402 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2025 15:11:49 UTC