- From: Roman Komarov via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 08:44:26 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'll need to do more research on this topic before I could respond further, but it feels necessary to link up two related issues with discussions from WCAG/WCAG3 here: - https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/1671 - https://github.com/w3c/wcag3/issues/261 On the first reading, the discussions there mostly agree that [SC 1.4.4](https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#resize-text) is not ideal, both in ensuring the small text is readable (where you could want to bump it up more than 200%), and that for larger texts the percentage (if used at all) should be smaller, as otherwise headers could fail [SC 1.4.10](https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#reflow). There were no resolution about anything though, and I will keep an eye on the Low Vision task force, and will bring these issues, and how they apply to this feature to them once it is restarted. Thank you, @patrickhlauke, for pointing to this group. --- @tobireif Yes, GH is the place to discuss that, although maybe we should open a separate issue about the possible accessibility implications of this feature :) -- GitHub Notification of comment by kizu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2528#issuecomment-2771846354 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2025 08:44:27 UTC