- From: rjgotten via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 15:53:07 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> @nmn > I also found the idea of mixing grid and masonry intriguing. I think it's worth considering layouts where certain columns ignore the row tracks and pack the children within them, but not others. Neither API proposal would currently support this. That would be a 'masonry inside grid' scenario, with `masonry-template-tracks: subgrid` to inherit the column tracks from the parent grid, I'd think. That is --_assuming_ masonry would get subgrid support to be able to use tracks from a parent grid. At that point it should probably be renamed `sub` with `subgrid` becoming a legacy alias; similar to e.g. `grid-gap` having become `gap`, etc. -- GitHub Notification of comment by rjgotten Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9041#issuecomment-2383581093 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 30 September 2024 15:53:08 UTC