- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 22:50:01 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-shadow-parts][css-nesting] is & allowed after ::part()`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: No change to spec. & is not allowed after ::part` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <dholbert> dbaron: this is getting into fun stuff that I don't have strong opinions about, mixing multiple new features<br> <dholbert> dbaron: is the & selector after ::part?<br> <dholbert> dbaron: we have restrictions saying these selectors are allowed, these aren't (after ::part)<br> <kbabbitt> s/selector after/selector allowed after/<br> <dholbert> dbaron: should we allow the nesting & selector after part, when it is a selector and is after part, or not<br> <fantasai> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10788#issuecomment-2329279090<br> <dholbert> fantasai: I'd go with "no" per this comment^<br> <dholbert> fantasai: we do allow ::is but with restrictions, IIRC<br> <dholbert> fantasai: the & is pulling in a whole type-selector ... Unless we're wanting to allow type-selector, I don't think it makes sense to allow &<br> <dholbert> fantasai: proposed resolution: no change to spec, & is not allowed after ::part<br> <dholbert> RESOLVED: No change to spec. & is not allowed after ::part<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10788#issuecomment-2380247183 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 27 September 2024 22:50:02 UTC