Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shadow-parts][css-nesting] is & allowed after ::part() (#10788)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-shadow-parts][css-nesting] is & allowed after ::part()`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: No change to spec. & is not allowed after ::part`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dholbert> dbaron: this is getting into fun stuff that I don't have strong opinions about, mixing multiple new features<br>
&lt;dholbert> dbaron: is the &amp; selector after ::part?<br>
&lt;dholbert> dbaron: we have restrictions saying these selectors are allowed, these aren't (after ::part)<br>
&lt;kbabbitt> s/selector after/selector allowed after/<br>
&lt;dholbert> dbaron: should we allow the nesting &amp; selector after part, when it is a selector and is after part, or not<br>
&lt;fantasai> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10788#issuecomment-2329279090<br>
&lt;dholbert> fantasai: I'd go with "no" per this comment^<br>
&lt;dholbert> fantasai: we do allow ::is but with restrictions, IIRC<br>
&lt;dholbert> fantasai: the &amp; is pulling in a whole type-selector ... Unless we're wanting to allow type-selector, I don't think it makes sense to allow &amp;<br>
&lt;dholbert> fantasai: proposed resolution: no change to spec, &amp; is not allowed after ::part<br>
&lt;dholbert> RESOLVED: No change to spec. &amp; is not allowed after ::part<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10788#issuecomment-2380247183 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 27 September 2024 22:50:02 UTC