- From: Ian Kilpatrick via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 05:51:04 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> So I'm not convinced that we need `inline-masonry`, authors can just use `inline masonry` instead. We should add it as a convenience (there isn't any reason not to). E.g. most developers will use just `inline-grid` and not `inline grid`, and would be unnecessarily surprised if `inline-masonry` isn't supported. We shouldn't make this more difficult unnecessarily. Ian -- GitHub Notification of comment by bfgeek Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10961#issuecomment-2378450498 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 27 September 2024 05:51:05 UTC