- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 23:25:32 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
(Sorry, me and Anders discussed this in person and I didn't come back to update the thread.) > Regarding the scope-name parameter: is it wise to add another scoping mechanism Yeah, let's drop that. Having a scoping name is only useful if we can rely on some variety of *defaults* to let you avoid specifying the scope most of the time. But here it would be required in every instance, meaning it's just part of the name anyway; you might as well just bake it into the name itself. So consider the proposal simplified: just a `global(<custom-ident>)` -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10808#issuecomment-2378112440 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2024 23:25:33 UTC