- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 22:37:39 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[web-animations-2] Progress APIs`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Clamp progress to [0,1]` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <fserb> github-bot take up https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8799<br> <fantasai> astearns: remaining question is whether we are clamping<br> <fantasai> flackr: we decided to add a progress accessor to animations<br> <fantasai> flackr: question was what to do outside the range of the animation<br> <fantasai> flackr: before animation starts or after it ends<br> <fantasai> flackr: I believe everyone is agreed that clamping is what makes sense, so want to resolve on it<br> <fantasai> flackr: [0%, 100%]<br> <fantasai> flackr: maps to the keyframe you're showing, assuming animation is in effect<br> <fantasai> astearns: any disagreement?<br> <fantasai> RESOLVED: Clamp progress to [0,1]<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8799#issuecomment-2378058917 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2024 22:37:40 UTC