Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] `view-transition-group` and tree-scoping (#10633)

The CSS Working Group just discussed ``[css-view-transitions-2] `view-transition-group` and tree-scoping``, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: v-t-group keywords are all "tree-scoped" in behavior`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;astearns> ack fantasai<br>
&lt;Zakim> fantasai, you wanted to react to dbaron<br>
&lt;astearns> ack khush<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> khush: for the scoping one, we made a similar resolution for anchor positioning, wondering if we should be consistent<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> khush: not like we're saying each keyword is a specific tree-scope, it's more like the property is tree scoped<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> khush: if it's tree scope matches, the property applies, regardless fo the tree scope<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> khush: so should we just say that in general - if the property applies, it has to match the tree scope?<br>
&lt;astearns> ack fantasai<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> fantasai: I think it makes sense to be tree-scoped, dunno if we can come up with something generic, lots of palces we dont' want to be tree-scoped<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> fantasai: but for VT I think we should<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> noamr: as a general rule I think if the property describes a "style"...<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> fantasai: I think we'll still have to take that case-by-case<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> noamr: agreeing with you<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> +1 from me on one-offing this for now, don't generalize yet<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> noamr: proposed resolution, all vt-group keywords are tree-scoped in behavior<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> khush: can you give an example of what it means for 'nearest' to be tree-scoped or not?<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> noamr: if you use 'nearest' in a shadow, and the nearest vt container is outside the shadow, it won't match<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> RESOLVED: v-t-group keywords are all "tree-scoped" in behavior<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> githbu-bot, take up https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10631<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10633#issuecomment-2377947186 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 26 September 2024 21:12:11 UTC