- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 18:10:58 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
noamr has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-view-transitions-2] Clarifications around `view-transition-group` == We recently resolved on `view-transition-group`, but a few things remained unresolved: - tree scoping: assuming that the `nearest` keyword and others are tree scoped like names. Verifying. (#10633) - mismatch: what happens when the old/new `view-transition-group` are not the same? (#10631). - Does `nearest` and `<<custom-ident>>` implicitly also mean `contain`? (#10780) Proposing: - `view-transition-group` semantics are tree-scoped - `view-transition-group` acts like `view-transition-class` in a mismatch (last capture wins) - `nearest` and `<<custom-ident>>` implicitly also main `contain` Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10957 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2024 18:10:59 UTC