- From: rjgotten via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 17:43:19 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> @nickautomatic > masonry has Flexbox-y aspects (it's not _entirely_ unlike a wrapping flex layout), and the defining feature of grid is the ability to control layout in two dimensions, which you partially give up in a masonry-type layout. That's the thing. Conceptually masonry _does_ flow like flex layout. It only shares some of its concepts with grid layout and column layout. Namely it shares with grid how you have control over the sizing of the tracks on the cross-axis, and it shares with column layout the auto-magical balancing of the contents over those cross-axis tracks. But the predominant part of its characteristics is more like flex than grid from a conceptual point of view. It's just that from an _implementation_ point of view (in engines) it appears to have major commonalities with grid layout mechanics. -- GitHub Notification of comment by rjgotten Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9041#issuecomment-2377572386 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2024 17:43:20 UTC