- From: Kokomi via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 06:28:39 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I believe that the term **pack** is the most appropriate. This is because it is extremely easy to understand for developers familiar with grid layout systems. While the Masonry layout system is one-directional, since it is implemented as part of the grid, developers are expected to adapt to the new functionality while maintaining the concept of two-dimensional layouts. By using the term `pack`, it intuitively conveys that Masonry's functionality is an "automatic packing function" that fills elements without gaps. On the other hand, the term `collapse` simply implies that the grid lines are removed, and it is expected that elements will float while maintaining the same display order as the existing grid layout. However, that differs from the actual result. Therefore, to correctly associate the actual layout method of the Masonry layout system with the concept of an "automatic packing function" held by developers familiar with grids, it is most logical to use the term `pack.` This allows developers to accurately understand the new functionality and achieve the expected layout. -- GitHub Notification of comment by cat394 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9733#issuecomment-2370303793 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2024 06:28:40 UTC