- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:02:48 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I agree that mix() and the progress functions should be consistent in their syntax, since they're doing such similar things. mix() doesn't have any choice - because it's using `<whole-value>`, the *only* choice for its separators are (upgradeable) commas; keywords are absolutely no-go. So that suggests we should shift the progress functions over to just being comma-separated arguments. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10862#issuecomment-2364732557 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 20 September 2024 23:02:48 UTC