Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position] anchor-scope and part descendant styling (#10525)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-anchor-position] anchor-scope and part descendant styling`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: the 'all' keyword is tree-scoped`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;chrishtr> tabatkins: anchor-scope, in addition to idents, can take the keyword 'all', which scopes all names. Should this be a tree-scoped 'all'? (i.e. only applies to the current tree scope<br>
&lt;chrishtr> tabatkins: proposed resolution: the 'all' keyword is also tree-scoped in the same way<br>
&lt;fantasai> sgtm<br>
&lt;khush> +1, again same pattern with view-transition-group<br>
&lt;chrishtr> RESOLVED: the 'all' keyword is tree-scoped<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10525#issuecomment-2358891015 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 18 September 2024 16:15:04 UTC