- From: Sam Weinig via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 15:22:58 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
weinig has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-fonts] Should `font-style: oblique 0deg` serialize as `oblique 0deg` or `normal`? == The WPT tests are a bit inconsistent on what they say, as are the implementations, but should `font-style: oblique 0deg` serialize as `oblique 0deg` or `normal`? In https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-fonts/variations/font-style-parsing.html, the test indicates `font-style: oblique 0deg` should serialize as is. In https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-fonts/animations/font-style-interpolation.html, the test indicates `font-style: oblique 0deg` should serialize as `normal`. My guess is the animation test is wrong, as the spec, https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-4/#font-style-prop, states that the computed value should be: > the keyword specified, plus angle in degrees if specified and the animation type should be: > by computed value type;[normal](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-4/#valdef-font-style-normal) animates as oblique 0deg Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10911 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 18 September 2024 15:22:59 UTC